Freedom/Free Will and Moral Responsiblity : A Reality or an Illusion?
Are we free or are we determined. Does being free
held us accountable for our actions?
Free will is a man's capacity to rationalise to be
able to choose to act the way he wants to, moral responsibility is when he is
accountable and responsible for his own actions. According Moya (2006.p.01)
when it comes to moral responsibility; he argues that, " the property
of human agents by virtue of which they are truly and objectively deserve moral
praise or blame for some of their actions". Some argue that, there is not
a sceptical challenge on this property. And free will is when free agents are
who are the main actors who determine their own actions; in this way a man is
held accountable and responsible for any action he does since he acts in his
own accord-in all, "freedom is a necessary condition for moral
responsibility (Moya.,2006.p.01). However, there is a scepticism on the notion
that; having a free will and being morally responsible is impossible.
Improbability of Moral Responsibility
Sceptics of moral responsibility claim that moral
responsibility is impossible whether determinism is true or not (French,
Wettstein and Fischer, 2005.p.13). There an agreement that responsibility so
conceived is impossible. It goes on to say that, nothing can be the cause of
itself; so for a man to be truly responsible for his actions, he would have to
be the cause[…] “therefore nothing can be truly responsible” (French, Wettstein
and Fischer, 2005.p.13 ). Due that for him to be accountable for his actions,
it would have to be one, who is of free-actions, which are up to the agent
(French et al., 2005.p.14). “And the free actions that are the ground of one’s responsibility
must be rational actions, at least in the sense that they are performed for
reasons, even if not for very good reasons” (French et al.,2005.p.14).
If a person does for an occasion, he does what he
does since of the way he mentally in some respect. Hence if what he does when
he acts for an occasion is to be up to him; then how he is mentally in some
respect, must be up to him. In order that he is responsible for how he is
mentally in that respect (French et al., 2005.p.14).This might mean if one has
a choice on what he does. There should be no determinism in a sense. For each
man to be morally responsible for an action of his, that should occur if only
he could have done otherwise, in in all determinism rules out alternative possibilities
(Moya., 2006.p.10). Strawson (1995.p.05)
state that whether determinism is true or not it does not matter, mankind
cannot be ultimately responsible their actions.
Determinism and Alternative Possiblities
By Siya Manci, 19th July 2017
Reference Lists
Moya, C.J.2006. Moral Responsibility: the ways of
scepticism. Routledge.
French,P.A, Wettstein, H.K and Fischer, J.M.2005.
Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Blackwell Publishing. Midwest Studies in
Philosophy, Vol XXIX.
Strawson, G.1995. The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility.
Springer. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the
Analytic Tradition, Vol. 75, No. 1/2, Free Will, Determinism, and Moral
Responsibility (Aug. 1994), pp.5-24:https://philosophy.as.uky.edu/sites/default/files/The%20Impossibility%20of%20Moral%20Responsibility%20-%20Galen%20Strawson.pdf
Comments
Post a Comment